To Trust or not to Trust: Part IV…Real Estate

This is the fourth in a series of posts on whether it makes sense to create a revocable living trust or not.  You can read previous posts here (health and age), here (family dynamics) and here (privacy and estate size).

The last reason that supports transferring assets into a living trust is based on a settlor’s ownership of real property.  The need for a living trust is particular important if the settlor owns real property in multiple states.

Based on a number of legal and constitutional reasons, states courts, including probate courts, only have jurisdiction over real property located inside their territorial boundaries.  A Virginia court cannot dictate orders on a piece of real property in Maryland. Without jurisdiction, a court does not have the power to distribute or transfer the real property to a beneficiary. If a testator owns property in several states, like a home at the beach or in the mountains, an ancillary probate administration will likely have to be opened in each state where the real property is owned.

The issues with ancillary probate are multi-faceted. Ancillary probate adds to the cost of administration. Multiple probate administrations generate duplicative fees, including multiple court fees, accounting fees, and attorneys’ fees. It could also mean paying state estate taxes on that real property if the ancillary probate state has an estate tax.

A second issue is if a person dies intestate. Each state has different rules on intestate succession, and it is possible that the heirs of an intestate estate could be different in the state of the primary probate proceeding versus the state of the ancillary probate proceeding. That could mean potential litigation as the two beneficiaries fight over the property.

Another issue is that primary administration in the state where the decedent died cannot be closed until the ancillary probate administration is closed.  Most times this is not a problem.  But, if the real property needs to be sold ancillary probate administration could drag on if the property is unattractive or the real estate market is depressed like in many parts of the country.  As ancillary administration drags on so does the primary administration which will further increase the costs of probate.

Finally, the next post in this series will be about when it doesn’t necessarily make sense to establish a living trust.

Advertisements

About Chris Guest

I am a trust and estate planning attorney working in the Washington, DC metro area. I offer comprehensive estate planning, trust administration, probate services and general business counseling for accountants, attorneys, business owners, consultants, federal and local government employees, retirees, other business professionals and other individuals.
This entry was posted in Ancillary Probate, Estate Planning, Factors for Creating, Probate, Real Property, Revocable Living Trusts, Trusts. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to To Trust or not to Trust: Part IV…Real Estate

  1. Pingback: To Trust or Not to Trust…Part 5: Age and Time Reasons to not Create a Revocable Living Trust? | VA Estate Planner

  2. Pingback: To Trust or Not to Trust…Part VI: Simple Estates Might Delay the Need to Create a Revocable Living Trust. | VA Estate Planner

  3. Pingback: To Trust or Not to Trust…Part VII: Simple Finances and Less Complex Family Dynamics Might Delay Need for a Revocable Living Trust. | VA Estate Planner

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s